Any Other Information for Disclosure of Updates to Ongoing Tax Litigations or Disputes | |
Sr.No. | Name of the opposing party | Date of initiation of the litigation / dispute | Status of the litigation / dispute as per last disclosure | Current status of the litigation / dispute |
1 | GST Authority-Tamilnadu State | 18-05-2024 | disclosure was not applicable as it was below the materiality thresholds. | Disputed Amt.-11.15 Lakhs
(a) Excess Input tax credit taken with respect to non-business transactions and exempt supplies
(b) Under declaration of ineligible ITC
The company received notice from GST authorities on 18.05.2024. As it is apparent on record that there is no excess input or under declaration of ITC, as claimed by the authorities and the amounts does not warrant any reversal, a detailed reply has submitted for the same on 14.06.2024 in consultation with our GST auditors for same.
The department vide its order dated 29.08.2024 dropped point (b) and retained point no.(a) for want of additional supporting documents to substantiate our claims and allowed us to file an appeal before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST), Chennai- II, within 90 days on receipt of this order. The company on 13.11.2024 has filed an appeal with above authority with all required supporting documents in consultation with our GST auditors and same is under consideration by the department. |
2 | GST Authority-Tamilnadu State | 26-11-2024 | disclosure was not applicable as it was below the materiality thresholds. | Disputed Amt.-17.89 Lakhs (a) Excess Input tax credit taken with respect to non-business transactions and exempt supplies
(b) Under declaration of ineligible ITC
(c) ITC Claimed on Supplier who failed to file GSTR-3B and did not pay
tax on the invoices declared in GSTR-01
The company received notice from GST authorities on 26.11.2024. As it is apparent on record that there is no excess input or under declaration of ITC, as claimed by the authorities and the amounts does not warrant any reversal, a detailed reply has submitted for the same on 26.12.2024 in consultation with our GST auditors for same.
The company has remitted this amount to the GST authorities and have taken up with vendors for refund of the GST collected and not remitted by them. |
3 | Income Tax act, 1961 | 31-03-2015 | Disclosure was not applicable as the case was initiated during the year 2014-15 | Disputed Amt.- 115.02 Lakhs. Appeal made by the Company w.r.t to the deduction in respect of dividend income u/s 80M r.w.s. 80AA of the Act and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has issued an order allowing the appeal and remitting the matter for recomputing. Department is yet to give effect to this. |
4 | Income Tax act, 1961 | 31-01-2013 | Disclosure was not applicable as it was initiated before LODR Regulations | Disputed Amt- 617.47 Lakhs. The Company had claimed an Exemption u/s 10(38) of Rs.1317.24 lakhs. The Company appealed to CIT(Appeals) which passed a decision in favour of the Company but later set aside by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Company has filed an appeal with the High court of Madras on 03.09.2012 and same is still pending before the High Court. |
5 | Income Tax act, 1961 | 31-01-2013 | Disclosure was not applicable as it was initiated before LODR Regulations | Disputed Amt-1129.05 Lakhs. The Company had claimed an Exemption u/s 10(38) of Rs.3826.05 lakhs. The Company appealed to CIT(Appeals) which passed a decision in favour of the Company but later set aside by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Company has filed an appeal with the High court of Madras on 03.09.2012 and same is still pending before the High Court. |
6 | Income Tax act, 1961 | 11-12-2018 | Disclosure was not applicable as this case was initiated before the applicability of relevant provision | Disputed Amt- 96.27 Lakhs. The Company had claimed an Exemption u/s 10(38) of Rs.478.28 lakhs. The Company appealed to CIT(Appeals) which passed a decision in favour of the Company but later set aside by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Company has filed an appeal with the High court of Madras on 03.09.2012 and same is still pending before the High Court. |
7 | Income Tax act, 1961 | 30-09-2016 | Disclosure was not applicable as this case was initiated before the applicability of relevant provision | Disputed Amt- 24.81 Lakhs. The Company filed a Petition for Rectification of Assessment under section 154 on 26.12.2016 for various mistakes apparent on record in the assessment order. The department is yet to rectify the same and re-issue the Assessment order. |
8 | Sales tax and VAT Laws | 18-03-2013 | Disclosure was not applicable as it was initiated before LODR Regulations | Disputed Amt- 14.20 lakhs. State preferred an appeal before The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench) Chennai against the order of Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)-I (FAC) which was in the Company's favour. Tribunal remanded the matter back to Assessing Officer vide orders dated 13.12.2017. The Assessing Officer is yet to respond for the same. |
9 | Sales tax and VAT Laws | 18-03-2013 | Disclosure was not applicable as it was initiated before LODR Regulations | Disputed Amt.- 12.05 Lakhs. State preferred an appeal before The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench) Chennai against the order of Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)-I (FAC) which was in the Company's favour. Tribunal remanded the matter back to Assessing Officer vide orders dated 13.12.2017. The Assessing Officer is yet to respond for the same. |